?

Log in

No account? Create an account
c is for cat

Rules for Anchorites

Letters from Proxima Thule

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Murder on the SF Express
Lost Girl
catvalente
I feel like we live in this weird dystopia where every actor who ever starred in a beloved SF series is now required by secretly-passed law to work on a cop procedural.

Yeah, the procedurals are cutesy and increasingly geek-friendly, but they're still contentless, riding on the good natured charisma of their actors, without lasting meaning or the ability to really deeply affect an audience. They are repetitive, they lack arcs by design, they wrap everything up neatly--your confession delivered in under an hour or it's free. While the shows that made those actors and actresses desirable got cancelled too soon, and fewer and fewer SF shows get made at all, because why bother when you can make a million seasons of the same half-comedic, gimmicky Law & Order clones. (If you believe television, the most common cause of death in America has to be bizarre-ass murder.)

This has got to be why there are so many versions of Sherlock Holmes being made all at once. He is the original hour-long cop procedural. He's a weird, gimmicky consultant to the police that doesn't have to play by their rules.

I mean, I enjoy them, sort of. I'm glad these people are getting work. But I could never love a cop show like I loved the SF shows they came from. Those became part of my internal mythology. They hit such amazing highs--and some equally amazing lows. But they risked, and they were new, and they made me feel, think, cry, long for unnameable possibilities. At best the procedurals make me laugh or cringe--there's not even the frisson of pity and fear that murder mysteries are supposed to engender. The victims are bodies-as-objects. They are clue factories. Plot coupons. We are never meant to feel too much in any one episode except the thrill of figuring out which actor is too big a star not to be the killer. They are like The Brady Bunch, but with death. Every episode resets the emotional and physical clock to zero.

But they're cute, escapist fun, I suppose. That thing that is supposed to damn all SF--cute, escapist fun. All the shows I recognize these actors from are gone, and they haven't really been replaced. There's a tiny number of speculative TV shows on right now compared to the sea of crime dramas, and I'm not head over heels for any of them except Doctor Who, which is a. the BBC and b. making me a sad panda most of the time these days.

But I can turn on any murder hour show and see my old friends, yelling at criminals and having unresolved sexual tension with their partners.*

It makes me sad. It feels like a lessening of the world in some weird way that probably doesn't even make any sense.

This late night curmudgeonation brought to you by seeing Mal Reynolds, Sam Anders, Sydney Bristow's roommate, and Wolf from the 10th Kingdom in an interrogation room together.



*Which, ok, I am TIRED of this trope. It's stupid, and it's boring. Will they, won't they. I don't care. When both of them are single and heterosexual and attracted to each other and they don't for no apparent reason it just doesn't make any sense CASTLE AND BECKETT. This is not what people do for years on end when they are extroverts. Especially when after a season or two the pair of them have no other significant friends outside of work or blood-relations. They are each other's whole lives but kissing is TOO MUCH COMMITMENT. RELATIONSHIPS ARE GROSS. It's not interesting or exciting to speculate beyond those one or two seasons, it's just dumb, because there's no reason they wouldn't get together except that Chris Carter ruined it for EVERYONE by mishandling Mulder and Scully in such an epic fucking fashion. So now everyone's afraid to have a couple onscreen that's just together, because apparently that sucks. But it does not suck as much as two grown-ass adults pussyfooting around their first kiss like kindergartners. And not talking to each other because god knows why. Either write them so that it really is a friendship without sexual attraction which is fine or let them have some character evolution. I'm so sick of it. GOD. DO NOT WANT any more shows where there's supposed to be chemistry between the leads because inevitably they will let it go too long and it will fizzle or they will sort of do it but then pull back in some bullshit non-human way BONES AND BOOTH. Say what you like but Aeryn and Crichton got together in episode 16, people. And broke up and got back together and screwed and cried and died and came back to life. It was great. There is more to love than the lead-up to the first date. UGH.


My favorite procedural is definitely Criminal Minds and it tries to subvert a lot of your complaints of the genre. IE, no sexual tension (or very little) within the team, giving the victims agency a hell of a lot of the time, often getting you emotionally connected to the victim or her (overwhelmingly, her) family or the cop of the week, and, mostly importantly, having some of the best character arcs on television. *swoons*

Yes, this. The team dynamics in CM are a beautiful thing to see.

Flashpoint inverts/subverts some of them as well, more and less effectively depending, but it's also a fun show.

But it does not suck as much as two grown-ass adults pussyfooting around their first kiss like kindergartners.

This, and everything around it.

YES, this. This isn't to say I don't enjoy them, but they pale in comparison to the SF series the actor came from.

(I think you meant Bones and Booth, or Brennan and Booth, since Bones and Brennan are the same person.)

I agree with you on most procedurals being pretty interchangeable and I have never gone out of my way to watch them...until The Wire. I just finished the first season and it is amazing. If you haven't seen it, you absolutely must watch it. No neat little bows. No will-they won't-they bullshit, no stark black and white cardboard cut-out characters. Everyone has an angle. Everyone is grey. And it makes you think.

I'm trying to watch the first season. I'm four eps in and I find it pretty boring, full of itself, and most of the time I can't even tell who is trying to do what, let alone become attached to the characters. This must be my fault since everyone says it's great. I'm still trying.

But it's not a procedural. Each hour doesn't solve a mystery and return to home base.

I know what you mean about the sexual tension between leads trope. It's okay for a little while, but gets very, very annoying, especially since it's in so many shows.

I like Warehouse 13, because while the show started with the sexual tension between Mika and Pete, they kind of worked it out between each other, letting it clearly settle into a sister/brotherly friendship. Their definitely close, but not sexually. It's really refreshing.

Warehouse 13 also now has a gay character

I think Homicide is my favorite police procedural. It did have some arcs.

Castle I find to be light fluffy fun, but I agree that the whole Castle/Beckett thing is ridiculous.

Enjoyed Doctor Who last night finally. Kept getting tricked by clip shows.

Anyone watch Monarch of the Glen? It it totally NOT a cop show. Tom Baker shows up for a couple seasons and his character is hilarious. Apparently, he was one of the original Doctors. Anthony Head makes a brief cameo as well. Susan Hampshire is fun to watch too.

I like to think Milagro (the Season Six episode where Creepy Writer Dude tries to get into Scully's trousers with insanely purple, insanely creepy self-insertion fic, only to find out she's already got the hots for Mulder) was Chris Carter realizing what a dumbass he had been - this character has obviously been in love for some time but you were so stuck on SEXUAL TENSION WOO you refused to acknowledge it - but the three seasons afterward sadly put the lie to that. Oh X-Files.

Oh bugger, I just got all X-Phile-y in public. PLZ IGNORE.

Entertaining side note: I once read a history of the KGB that supposedly quoted from interviews with ex-KGBs officers that "The reason that American television has so many police shows is that it propagates the myth of the invincible FBI agent who can defeat all crime, which makes communist sympathizers less likely to cause trouble."

I don't actually believe it, but given the book was written in the (I think) early 1980s and was talking about 1950s and 1960s television, the problem has apparently been around a while.

What's worse was Shatner coming back to Star Trek to direct _The Undiscovered Country_ -- and turning it into the Hooker cop show!

Kaytee Sackhoff in 24, the damage which is Hawaii Five-Oh!, it's so very very sad...but at least we get to see our favorite actors from shows we love getting work. And if we remember them, they get to do more things we will enjoy. I guess Sackhoff auditioned for the female lead in Castle. That would have been weird. Mal and Starbuck. Weird or extra-awesome.

Thing is you really can't take Starbuck and put her in another SF role. Harrison Ford didn't pull it off in the 80's by going from Han Solo to Rick Deckard. Only it's cult status kept Blade Runner as such a strong SF movie. Even he didn't like the movie at the time. Sticking to one genre is what turns actresses into Scream Queens and actors into Eric Roberts.