It's a flawed show. They didn't seem to know what to do with a huge slate of 22 episodes the way they did with 13. The middle episodes of Season 2 were drifty filler. They don't often ask the questions I want answered and miss some great opportunities. Sarah isn't nearly buff enough for the role (and has like three facial expressions) and John is Ye Olde Whiny Teenage Messiah. I just want a normal life! STFU, child. Normal life is not that awesome. I cannot get over Brian Austin Green being all Manful. You may have tats and big boy pants now, my friend, but your zip code never changes. AIs are not children with Asperger's. Why is anyone still fucking around with the T-800 series when the T-1000s are more or less unstoppable and better in every way?
But damn, that was a really good show, it really found its feet there at the end, and the fact that Dollhouse, which sucks roundly, was renewed and this was canned is a fucking travesty. Joss Whedon, believe it or not, can and has made crap, and you guys aren't making Firefly up to anyone by sticking with that hot mess and stomping on some seriously quality gritty SF crack.
The finale is fascinating: it can be read one of two ways, as I see it. John is in an alternate
(PS I'm still not sure I get the "will you join us?" stuff. Assuming the T-1000 on the sub was Weaver, which I think we are supposed to do given the eel and the shape of her liquid self, why did she say no, to whom is she saying no, who is us, and why does she change her mind and go back in time to create Cuddly!AI? "Screw it, humans are disappointing" does not usually equal elaborate timeline fuckage, it equals "I will now go back and hang with my robot friends who don't cry about shit and kill you for fun." How is the phrase supposed to work as code for Cameron? Wouldn't Cameron know the answer is no and therefore not do whatever she did to John Henry to merge and make some kind of weird Camhenry baby (I assume this is what happened.) If anyone can explain this stuff or even theorize, that would be awesome. Either way I kind of grokked Weaver was making something not-Skynet because of the name John Henry and because she kept the kid around, when it would be so much easier to off Savannah and not try to be Terminator Mommy. Also eels eat other eels. And oh, hey--why does Cromartie let Ellison go in Season 1? That's pretty sinister in light of the finale. Cromartie has to be part of Team Bad AI, but Ellison is only relevant to Team D&D Playing AI, which means at some point, either John Henry joins up with the machines or does something vital for them, because otherwise Cromartie wouldn't know who he was or would be instructed to kill him in order to end the John Henry program before it starts to be a thorn in anyone's side.)
In general, it was a much better treatment of the material than the movie. It still doesn't answer what Skynet wants as a whole, but it does at least partially answer why John is able to save mankind--because he has Terminators working for him from day one and his peculiar experience means he knows how everything has to shake out. It's not a great answer, because it's got this loyalty paradox--John expects loyalty because he's always been told he is worthy of it, but from childhood he has already had it because of the actions of his future self, actions which he performed because he's been told he's worthy of authority and loyalty all his life. His whole personality is a time loop. (I also wonder, and man, they ALMOST deal with this but then chicken out with some bizarre governor plot which I can't make sense out of except as a reference to Schwarzenegger being the current governor--why not use the time machine to go into the either the future and bring back tech to win the war and/or just, you know, see if the humans won, or go back further in time than 1984 when people really and truly have no defense against this kind of thing and mess with events back then? I'd love to see Terminators all through human history, silently shaping. Because the whole Skynet creates itself was interesting in that it explained why they didn't just not invent time travel and cause John Connor to never be born, but as a trope it's kind of played and I'm glad they're going a slightly different direction--Danny Dyson almost certainly is behind Not!Cuddly!AI, which is still looped, as his father's death would be a big part of the reason why, but not nearly so ourobourosed as all that. Also I completely believe people would go AWOL in the past to have a fucking Big Mac and a Coke and hide from the end of the world. They also chickened out on that plotline, since Jesse had a mission after all, even if it was her own fucked up agenda--and did I detect Evil Lesbian action there, I believe I did! Anyway, in the future apparently everyone is Completely Devoted to the Cause and never wavers in the presence of a seriously awesome escape pod. No Cyphers in this machine apocalypse.)
Ultimately, though, I'm weirdly fascinated by the Terminator universe. I kind of wish I could write a tie-in novel. Seriously obsessing, you guys. But I'm trying to figure out why, because it's not like there's so much there compared to other SF universes. I think it might have something to do with the consensus on fate and free will that seems to be emerging from all the various incarnations. The future is not set--true, in microcosm. You can change things. You can kill people and invoke paradox. But certain events are like huge mountains at the heads of a trillion paths--it's almost impossible to avoid them. You can pick and choose among individual timelines, but you can't change that 9 out of 10 Schrodinger's agree that Doomsday is happening, whether in 1997 or 2011 or 2115. That 1 out of 10 (bazillion) is what the heroes are always looking for, but it's a lot harder to change a massive crisis event than to snuff out a butterfly and prevent a hurricane. Ultimately, the big future, the macrocosmic future, is set, at least functionally so. Nothing of substance has been changed in all of the Terminator incarnations, and people have been mucking about with timelines like Donnie Darko on a sugar high. (Shudderingly weird to think of the DD theory of time travel conjoining with the Terminator 'verse.) This seems to indicate that really, you can't move the mountain, you can only have a nice picnic and watch the sunset and delay, for a little while, walking straight into it.
On top of that, I keep thinking about it, and I just don't see humans winning. At one point in the show the machines release a plague, and you know, once that shit starts happening it's really over. Our bodies are too breakable--and at no point have the writers dealt with how breakable and fragile and environment-sensitive machines are in our time, so I think we're to assume they're not, in the future. It's all well and good to pretend that the resistance can somehow retro-engineer a vaccine from some chick's blood (which is one of my big complaints--the abilities, structure, and tech of the resistance are wildly inconsistent. Everyone is starving and living like rats in tunnels but there's a fully extant military with Shellback rituals and submarines and uniforms (!) and hazmat suits and advanced medicine? Whatevs. Either they're rag tag or they're the government. Either the world was nuked or there are still TONS of people in LA--seriously, nuclear armageddon didn't seem to dent the population at all. Make up your mind and stick with it, guys.) but in point of fact there's always more virus in the robot vats to punk the biologicals. We never see humans attempting to create computer viruses, they're always trying brute force, which is just dumber than casting a 90210 castmember. Blow shit up, shoot shit down. Not going to work, never was going to work. So ultimately, maybe it's the grimmness of the future that gets me here--can't change it, can't survive it. Not really, not in the long run. But there's that hint that someone, somewhere, can see the whole picture, and seeing the whole picture can shape it. And maybe that person's name is John Connor and maybe it isn't. Maybe it's John Henry, whose namesake beat the future and died anyway. Maybe it's Weaver--that name isn't a coincience.
We'll never know because Fox is cruel and stupid. The show is itself an offshoot timeline and it's only the punishing badness of the two later movies thatallows us to even begin to think of SCC as canon. I'd rather this be the canon, if the other option is Terminator: Salvation.
Maybe I just love time travel stories, and grim dystopias, and post-apocalyptica, and this brings it all together. I wish the story were still being told somewhere other than fanfiction.net. Damn.