Seriously. You guys have got to stop.
You are showing your ass in public. I cannot overstate the aptness of this metaphor. This kind of behavior is exactly the same thing as running out in the town square, dropping your pants, and slapping your pustule-laden ass while babbling about the end times.
The Internet is the public sphere. It is not a private salon where only your friends will hear you and forgive you because they know you're a really nice guy at heart. Apologies to all, but fuck Usenet. That ship has sailed. This is becoming embarrassing for everyone. Why it's always people in my genre that feel the need to jump up and holler I have no idea, but seriously, knock it the fuck off.
I'm not going to try to talk y'all into, you know, not thinking stupid things, because I think we all know that's a lifetime's work and the truth is everyone involved has better things to do. Allow me, instead, to appeal to a baser, more primitive instinct than the basic fucking sense of decency that might lead you to not shit all over anyone different from you.
You are hurting yourselves.
It's a pretty simple equation, really. Limited lifespan divided by number of books it's possible to consume due to vagaries of money and mortality equals I am not buying your books if you behave like a fuckmuppet in public.
Oh, but it should be about the art, shouldn't it? We should separate the art from the artist.
Allow me to be frank.
I might be willing to do that kind of forgiveness for genius-level work. I can get through Aristotle and Euripides even if they aren't so hot with the chicks. Ditto Tolkien, Eliot, Henry Miller. I can stomach a little Lovecraft, even. I can just barely almost start thinking about Ender's Game and Wyrms because he wasn't spouting that shit when I read them. Hell, I'll even throw in Mark Helprin's Winter's Tale, (author is a neocon copyright illiterate sack of hubris) but Winter's Tale is the bargain basement lowest denominator level of genius I require before I even start trying to overlook your ass in my public.
For your derivative hacktastic doorstopper fantasy? Not a chance. You guys? Are no Winter's Tale. Y'all aren't even Wyrms.
It takes work and energy above and beyond the reading of the book for me to get over authorial fuckmuppetry. I am not sitting down to that task for pastel-covered, ______ of Made Up Word _______, sloppy Joseph Campbell blowjob extruded product. Especially since that product is likely colored by the personal beliefs of the authors, which are, in general, ugly and cruel.
Guys, learn this rule. Love it. Embrace it.
Every time you bloviate offensively on the internet, a reader swears off your work for life.
It is so easy to lose readers. A cranky day at a con will do it. A single bad book will do it. Insulting an entire swath of readers, calling them evil and immoral, or shouting their concerns down and swearing at them? Especially when SFF readership has rather a lot of the sort of readers you're likely to insult with this kind of nonsense? Will do it so incredibly efficiently it'll make Bookscan spin. Especially if you happen to be a midlist or indie writer, and can't weather decreased sales with a shrug and a grin.
Not to mention? If you really, in your heart of hearts, think there is a homosexual agenda, a PC army, a feminist conspiracy--why do you feel so comfortable and gleeful spewing bile about them in public? I assure you, the easiest way to determine who has power in a culture and who does not is to look at who feels safe to speak freely, and who does not. The homosexual/feminist/PC agenda? I'll give it to you in one sentence:
We would like to be treated as humans.
That's it. That's all. And that does not actually impinge on your right to be treated as same.
Some days I feel like the internet is a possessing demon, and when people I thought were on my team start slashing at me and mine with claws out, teeth bared, it was just their turn to be possessed. It's easier than dealing with the idea that I've misjudged people so badly. That I pass enough to earn the basic minimum of human treatment in person, but that thin veneer of passing is all that protects me from their dark, ugly internal drives, their fear, their rage. I don't want my "office" to be peopled with dangerously unfiltered folk who hate people like me, and only hug me when we meet because for a moment, I looked like them.
But I am digressing. I said I wouldn't try to change your minds. It's pointless. All I'm saying is that when given an opportunity to spend my $10 on a book by someone who hasn't personally insulted me and my friends, and someone who has? It's an easy choice. It's a predictable choice. And fortunately, not a one of you is making it any harder by writing such heartbreaking works of genius that I have to second guess that choice, even a little bit.
So, uh, thanks, I guess.
- An Open Letter
cranky
2009-08-14 06:18 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:58 pm (UTC)
Cat - I was waiting to hear what you might have to say on this (these) matter(s), and may I say - you don't disappoint a girl.
2009-08-14 06:21 pm (UTC)
Nicely put. For the record, I couldn't finish Ender's Game because it was boring. Then I found out Card was a serious bigot.
2009-08-14 06:23 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:25 pm (UTC)
If people really wonder why some writers keep saying awful things in public, it is because there is no reason not to, in the end. Hell, if the Scientologists can continue to have a major turnout for their annual competitions, this should be no surprise. (Plus, of course, there are plenty of right-wing crackpots who WILL buy books when they read right-wing crackpottery.)
2009-08-14 06:26 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:25 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:28 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:25 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:29 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:27 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:29 pm (UTC)
Seriously, though, thanks for this.
2009-08-14 06:30 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:33 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:31 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 09:19 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:32 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:33 pm (UTC)
Nothing left to say...
2009-08-14 06:32 pm (UTC)
*applauds!*
2009-08-14 06:33 pm (UTC)
The other sad part is that a great many people in the world are split into such small groups that they only see their tiny little slice of reality and anything else is verboten! It takes effort to open your eyes and see another point of view and a lot of people aren't taught that growing up.
We seriously need to stop being ( insert term here ) with respect to each other and start just being people. People with equal rights, people with personal beliefs, people with separate faiths. People of all shapes and sizes and differing viewpoints and lives.
But still people.
I don't know what else to say. :-(
2009-08-14 06:35 pm (UTC)
I have a box. I call it my Orson Scott Card box. It's where I put those authors whose -writing- I like, yet whose -personal viewpoints- I disagree with quite profoundly. It's the only way I can still enjoy those works of theirs I fell in love with to some degree or another before I learned how they felt regarding certain things. That way, my memory of Ender's Game, for example, isn't quite as tainted. Maybe I'll never read anything else by Card in my life, but at least I'll have that book, which made me happy when I was younger.
There are a handful of writers who've been put in my Orson Scott Card box. I cry a little every time I'm forced to expand its population.
In short: I agree with you that everyone deserves the right to be treated as humans. And a person's work isn't necessarily representative of their beliefs, and we don't always have to throw away the good stuff just because we learn unpleasant truths about the author... it just hurts when we do.
2009-08-14 06:37 pm (UTC)
What's with this year, this year?
2009-08-14 06:48 pm (UTC)
Re: What's with this year, this year?
2009-08-14 06:54 pm (UTC)
*shakes head*
2009-08-14 06:50 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 06:51 pm (UTC)
Just about the only person who's art is good enough to make me read in spite of his politics is Ezra Pound.
I say his because I'm not thinking of any women who behave that badly, though doubtless there are some.
Fortunately haven't read Simmons, and sure won't.
2009-08-14 06:53 pm (UTC)
I do love Winter's Tale, but I didn't know about the politics when I read it, and he's made the choice easy by never writing genre again. Not that I only read genre, but it's definitely a +5.
2009-08-14 06:57 pm (UTC)
Well said.
I understand where the sheer size of the Internet can -ironically enough- push people into like minded groups with little interaction beyond it. However, in a public profession such as writing SF/F, you will be exposed to other points of view. You depend on people with those other points of view to buy your work. How can you be so intolerant as to piss off a good amount of your potential readership?
And where the hell are other conservatives who should be pointing out that bigotry != conservativism?
You start to get the feeling like you're arguing with a Flat Earther after a while.
2009-08-14 07:00 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 07:06 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 07:07 pm (UTC)
After reading Wright's post yesterday, I was cross-eyed with rage. I mean, I am the straightest mofo around, but that has no bearing on my empathy for ANYONE who gets denigrated so meanly and totally. And from a perspective that is inconsistent and based on "laws" that are highly subjective and designed to make some people feel good about their close-mindedness and lack of imagination.
He's a dick, pure and simple. So is Card. I read neither of them (although in high school aeons ago I was a big Card fan), and see no need to when there are plenty of other authors out there who write better and aren't dicks.
2009-08-14 07:07 pm (UTC)
This.
2009-08-14 07:08 pm (UTC)
& i didn't know that about helprin, and it makes me sad as 'winter's tale' is an all-time favorite.
2009-08-14 07:12 pm (UTC)
2009-08-14 07:11 pm (UTC)
It's hard to call myself a feminist and still read Heinlein some days, but as I say, at least I know that I'm not uninformed about his opinions in the event that someone wants to have a conversation, and some of his work is, to me, truly brilliant.
2009-08-14 07:53 pm (UTC)
You can sift Heinlein (and Rand, or Cleaver, or whoever) for the interesting ideas, so long as you don't let the terrible ideas and superiority complex get you thinking you're [allthat+bagofchips]. So long as you don't let those pitfalls catch you, and your literary excursions don't net the author or estate any money, it's fine to cast the nets for the actually interesting ideas. Just keep your bullshit detector on and in good operating order :p .
At least, that's been my approach. I still enjoy authors like Card and Herbert, too, but I come toting my Fremkit full of grains of salt and my "Othering" polarized goggles.
2009-08-14 07:21 pm (UTC)
Aristotle says that when you work on being virtuous you become more human. Mr. Wright is active negating his humanity though he obviously thinks he's the virtuous one here because he doesn't fuck guys.
2009-08-14 07:24 pm (UTC)
Like, say, me. My next book is from Tor.
2009-08-14 07:22 pm (UTC)
And even if "I'll never buy your book again!" really does have no impact on the writer, it does have some impact on me: I will not look at my bookshelf and flinch, and be reminded of people who don't think I and my kin ought to be treated like not-quite-real-people. It's worth it just for that.
And saying, "This is not okay, and I won't stand for it, and I will do the only tangible thing in my power to demonstrate that it's not okay" is empowering, in the most straightforward sense of the word. Even if some of the authors -- even if most of the authors -- don't get a direct financial hit, it's still worth it. And some day, if enough people see and hear and agree, it may actually reach the point of being a financial hit.
Or maybe not. I don't know. But it's still a valid response.
boycotting bigots is good for ME
2009-08-15 06:06 am (UTC)